"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
02/18/2017 at 14:00 • Filed to: None | 5 | 11 |
I don’t think it’s an Icon, but it definitely has a bit of that vibe going for it. If anybody can tell me any more about this I’d be interested to know. Although to be honest I prefer !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! . EDIT: After comparing pictures, I think this may very well be an Icon Land Cruiser. EDIT 2: Ok, it’s not an Icon, it looks like it may just have been done in the style of Icon (or potentially by another company with the same owner, not sure).
Matsayz
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/18/2017 at 14:04 | 1 |
So cool.
HammerheadFistpunch
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/18/2017 at 14:11 | 2 |
That vibe > this vibe http://oppositelock.kinja.com/custom-design-1792514868
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> HammerheadFistpunch
02/18/2017 at 14:16 | 0 |
I just saw that Vibe. That Vibe is awful.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> HammerheadFistpunch
02/18/2017 at 15:11 | 0 |
Does this look like an Icon to you?
CCC (formerly CyclistCarCoexist)
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/18/2017 at 20:24 | 1 |
I like how this person put land cruiser badges and not Icon badges.
Liam Farrell
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/18/2017 at 20:24 | 1 |
Not an icon, but very well could be a TLC truck which is a company owned by the same guy, but they just do restorations and resto-mods. Very nice truck nonetheless, might be cleaner than the Icon I see a bunch
JeepJeremy
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/25/2017 at 19:54 | 0 |
Ever visit this site?: http://www.vintageoffroad.com/
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> JeepJeremy
02/25/2017 at 19:57 | 2 |
I have now
Liam Farrell
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
02/25/2017 at 20:09 | 1 |
Nope, still not, the Icons use Fox coilovers, while that is clearly on leaf springs
http://www.icon4x4.com/gallery/photography/fj
Liam Farrell
> Liam Farrell
02/25/2017 at 20:13 | 1 |
Also the fuel door placement and type, the icons have it in a locking door in the back.
sm70- why not Duesenberg?
> Liam Farrell
02/25/2017 at 20:20 | 0 |
Good catch!